Government microeconomic intervention (A Level) Banker
66 questions · about 11% of the marks we indexed · examined in 9 of 9 sessions.
Questions by year
2026
2026 May/June · Paper 32 · Q81 markLabour markets and intervention
2026 May/June · Paper 32 · Q91 markEquity and redistribution
2026 May/June · Paper 32 · Q101 markPolicies to correct market failure
2026 May/June · Paper 32 · Q111 markPolicies to correct market failure
2026 May/June · Paper 32 · Q121 markLabour markets and intervention
2026 May/June · Paper 42 · Q310 marksLabour markets and intervention
2025
2025 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q91 markPolicies to correct market failure
2025 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q101 markEquity and redistribution
2025 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q121 markLabour markets and intervention
2025 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q281 markEquity and redistribution
2025 Oct/Nov · Paper 42 · Q210 marksPolicies to correct market failure
2025 Oct/Nov · Paper 42 · Q310 marksLabour markets and intervention
2025 May/June · Paper 32 · Q81 markPolicies to correct market failure
2025 May/June · Paper 32 · Q91 markGovernment failure
2025 May/June · Paper 32 · Q101 markEquity and redistribution
2025 May/June · Paper 32 · Q111 markPolicies to correct market failure
2025 May/June · Paper 32 · Q121 markLabour markets and intervention
2025 May/June · Paper 32 · Q131 markLabour markets and intervention
2025 May/June · Paper 32 · Q141 markLabour markets and intervention
2025 May/June · Paper 32 · Q251 markEquity and redistribution
2025 May/June · Paper 42 · Q210 marksPolicies to correct market failure
2025 May/June · Paper 42 · Q310 marksLabour markets and intervention
2024
2024 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q111 markPolicies to correct market failure
2024 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q121 markLabour markets and intervention
2024 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q131 markLabour markets and intervention
2024 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q141 markLabour markets and intervention
2024 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q151 markEquity and redistribution
2024 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q241 markEquity and redistribution
2024 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q291 markEquity and redistribution
2024 Oct/Nov · Paper 42 · Q1 (a, c)8 marksLabour markets and intervention
2024 Oct/Nov · Paper 42 · Q310 marksPolicies to correct market failure
2024 May/June · Paper 32 · Q111 markPolicies to correct market failure
2024 May/June · Paper 32 · Q121 markPolicies to correct market failure
2024 May/June · Paper 32 · Q131 markLabour markets and intervention
2024 May/June · Paper 32 · Q141 markLabour markets and intervention
2024 May/June · Paper 32 · Q151 markLabour markets and intervention
2024 May/June · Paper 42 · Q1 (c)6 marksLabour markets and intervention
2024 May/June · Paper 42 · Q210 marksPolicies to correct market failure
2023
2023 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q101 markLabour markets and intervention
2023 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q111 markLabour markets and intervention
2023 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q121 markEquity and redistribution
2023 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q131 markEquity and redistribution
2023 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q141 markPolicies to correct market failure
2023 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q161 markLabour markets and intervention
2023 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q271 markEquity and redistribution
2023 Oct/Nov · Paper 42 · Q1 (a, c)9 marksEquity and redistribution · Policies to correct market failure
2023 May/June · Paper 32 · Q131 markLabour markets and intervention
2023 May/June · Paper 32 · Q151 markEquity and redistribution
2023 May/June · Paper 32 · Q161 markLabour markets and intervention
2023 May/June · Paper 32 · Q171 markPolicies to correct market failure
2023 May/June · Paper 42 · Q210 marksPolicies to correct market failure
2022
2022 Oct/Nov · Paper 12 · Q181 markPolicies to correct market failure
2022 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q131 markPolicies to correct market failure
2022 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q141 markEquity and redistribution
2022 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q151 markEquity and redistribution
2022 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q161 markLabour markets and intervention
2022 Oct/Nov · Paper 32 · Q171 markLabour markets and intervention
2022 Oct/Nov · Paper 42 · Q48.3333 marksLabour markets and intervention
2022 May/June · Paper 32 · Q41 markPolicies to correct market failure
2022 May/June · Paper 32 · Q131 markPolicies to correct market failure
2022 May/June · Paper 32 · Q141 markPolicies to correct market failure
2022 May/June · Paper 32 · Q151 markEquity and redistribution
2022 May/June · Paper 32 · Q161 markLabour markets and intervention
2022 May/June · Paper 32 · Q171 markLabour markets and intervention
2022 May/June · Paper 42 · Q4 (b)4.3333 marksPolicies to correct market failure
2022 May/June · Paper 42 · Q58.3333 marksLabour markets and intervention
No questions match this filter.
References only, not question text. Open Official paper ↗ where Cambridge publishes the paper,
or see the official Cambridge past-papers page; for other papers, ask your
school. “Paper 42” means Paper 4, variant 2.
Practice questions
Original questions written by HomiLabs in the style of the exam, with answers and mark schemes. They are not
Cambridge past paper questions and have not been reviewed by Cambridge. Try each one before opening the answer.
Q1Labour markets and intervention · Core · Paper 3 style · 1 mark
(a)[1]
Show answer
(a) B 3
Marginal products are 20, 18, 16, 12, 8, so MRP = 100, 90, 80, 60, 40. The firm hires while MRP ≥ wage: the 3rd worker adds $80 > $70, the 4th adds only $60 < $70. C assumes hiring continues until total output is high rather than comparing MRP with the wage.
Q2Labour markets and intervention · Core · Paper 4 style · 5 marks
(a)Define marginal revenue product of labour.[2]
(b)Explain why a firm's demand curve for labour slopes downwards.[3]
Show answer
(a) The extra revenue a firm earns from employing one more worker: marginal physical product × marginal revenue (or price in perfect competition).
1 change in total revenue from one more worker; 1 MPP × MR.
(b) Diminishing marginal returns: as more workers are added to fixed capital, MPP and therefore MRP fall; the firm hires up to where MRP = wage, so at a lower wage it hires more workers; the MRP curve is the demand curve.
1 diminishing marginal returns/falling MPP in short run; 1 MRP falls as employment rises; 1 profit-maximising firm employs where wage = MRP, so a lower wage → more workers (MRP curve = demand curve).
Q3Labour markets and intervention · Core · Paper 4 style · 6 marks
A leading Pakistani cricketer earns Rs 80 million a year from playing and sponsorship. The best alternative job open to him is coaching, which would pay Rs 6 million a year.
(a)Calculate the cricketer's economic rent.[1]
(b)Explain why economic rent forms a large part of the earnings of top sports players.[3]
(c)State two factors that affect the elasticity of supply of labour to an occupation.[2]
Show answer
(a) Rs 74 million a year
1 80 − 6 = Rs 74 million.
(b) Their supply is highly inelastic because talent is rare and cannot be quickly trained; demand (from leagues, sponsors, broadcasters) is high, so the wage is far above transfer earnings.
1 rare natural talent → very inelastic supply; 1 high demand/MRP (TV and sponsorship revenue); 1 so earnings well above transfer earnings, most is economic rent.
(c) Any two: length of training/qualifications required; skills needed; geographical and occupational mobility; time period; availability of workers in other occupations; non-monetary benefits.
1 each.
Q4Labour markets and intervention · Core · Paper 4 style · 6 marks
(a)Explain why the demand for labour is a derived demand.[2]
(b)Explain two factors that affect the wage elasticity of demand for labour.[4]
Show answer
(a) Labour is demanded not for itself but for the goods and services it helps to produce; demand for workers depends on demand for the product.
1 demanded for what it produces; 1 changes in product demand change labour demand.
(b) Any two: ease of substituting capital for labour; price elasticity of demand for the product; proportion of labour costs in total costs; time period.
Up to 2 each: factor identified + direction explained (e.g. easy to replace workers with machines → elastic).
Q5Labour markets and intervention · Standard · Paper 3 style · 1 mark
(a)The supply of labour to an occupation is L = 20W − 200, where W is the hourly wage in $ and L the number of workers. The market wage is $30 per hour. What is the total economic rent earned by the workers per hour?[1]
Show answer
(a) A $4,000
L = 400 at W = 30; supply starts at W = 10 when L = 0. Total earnings = 30 × 400 = $12,000. Transfer earnings = area under the supply curve = ½ × 400 × (10 + 30) = $8,000. Economic rent = area above supply, below the wage = ½ × 400 × 20 = $4,000. C is transfer earnings.
Q6Labour markets and intervention · Standard · Paper 4 style · 8 marks
(a)Explain two reasons why software engineers in Lahore usually earn more than food delivery riders.[4]
(b)Consider whether a higher national minimum wage would reduce the wage differential between the two groups.[4]
Show answer
(a) Higher MRP: engineers' productivity and the value of software output is high, so demand for them is high; supply is limited by long training and scarce skills (inelastic), whereas riders need few skills, so supply is large and elastic.
Up to 2 for demand/MRP reason; up to 2 for supply reason (training, skills, barriers to entry); or other valid reasons such as international demand for engineers.
(b) It would raise riders' pay (if the minimum is above their market wage and enforced) so the gap narrows, but riders may lose jobs or hours, many are self-employed gig workers outside the law, and engineers' pay is unaffected or rises further.
Analysis (up to 3): minimum wage above equilibrium raises pay of low-paid; engineers paid well above minimum so differential falls; possible excess supply/unemployment among riders. Consideration (1+): enforcement in informal/gig work, platform responses, differentials may re-emerge; judgement.
Q7Labour markets and intervention · Standard · Paper 4 style · 8 marks
(a)Explain, with the help of a diagram, how a trade union may raise the wage in a competitive labour market, and the effect on employment.[4]
(b)Consider whether the effect of a trade union on employment would be different if the employer were a monopsonist.[4]
Show answer
(a) By collective bargaining the union sets a wage above equilibrium; the supply curve becomes horizontal at the union wage up to the original supply; firms move up the demand (MRP) curve so employment falls.
1 collective bargaining/threat of strike sets wage above equilibrium; 1 diagram: labour market with W and L axes, wage floor; 1 employment falls along MRP/demand curve; 1 excess supply of labour (or effect smaller if demand is wage inelastic / productivity agreements shift MRP).
(b) Yes: a union facing a monopsonist acts as bilateral monopoly; a negotiated wage between the monopsony wage and the competitive level can raise both wage and employment. The outcome depends on bargaining strength and where the wage is set; above the competitive level employment falls.
Analysis (up to 3): monopsony pays below MRP; union wage makes MCL flat; employment can rise. Consideration (1+): if wage set too high employment falls; firms may substitute capital; depends on relative bargaining power; judgement.
Q8Labour markets and intervention · Standard · Paper 4 style · 8 marks
Invented article. A food delivery platform in Karachi used 15,000 riders. It cut the payment per delivery from Rs 120 to Rs 100. Three months later 14,100 riders were still working for it. Two smaller platforms also operate in the city.
(a)Calculate the wage elasticity of supply of riders. Give your answer to two decimal places.[2]
(b)Explain two reasons why the supply of riders might be wage inelastic.[3]
(c)Consider whether the data suggest that the platform company has monopsony power.[3]
(b) Few alternative jobs for low-skilled workers in the city; riders have already bought motorcycles; many need income urgently and cannot afford to be unemployed; low occupational mobility.
1 + 1 for two reasons; 1 for development linking to small change in labour supplied.
(c) Possibly: it could cut pay by 17% and still keep 94% of riders, suggesting few alternative employers; but riders may work for several platforms, the data cover a short period and other factors (unemployment rising) may explain it.
1 monopsony = dominant buyer of labour able to set wage; 1 evidence: large pay cut, small fall in riders; 1 consideration of other explanations/limitations.
Q9Labour markets and intervention · Standard · Paper 4 style · 8 marks
(a)Explain why an individual's supply curve of labour may bend backwards at high wage rates.[4]
(b)Consider the implications of a backward-bending supply curve for a government that cuts income tax rates to increase hours worked.[4]
Show answer
(a) A higher wage has a substitution effect (leisure becomes more expensive → work more) and an income effect (higher income → want more leisure, a normal good → work less). At high wages the income effect can outweigh the substitution effect, so hours offered fall.
1 substitution effect explained; 1 income effect explained; 1 at low wages substitution dominates (upward slope); 1 at high wages income effect dominates (backward bend).
(b) A tax cut raises the net wage; for workers on the upward part hours rise, but for high earners on the backward-bending part hours may fall, so the policy may not raise labour supply; effect varies between groups and contracts often fix hours.
Analysis (up to 3): tax cut = higher net wage; outcome depends on which effect dominates for each group; may reduce hours of high earners. Consideration (1+): many workers cannot choose hours; participation decisions (second earners) may respond more; judgement.
Q10Labour markets and intervention · Challenge · Paper 3 style · 1 mark
(a)[1]
Show answer
(a) A $16
The monopsonist hires where MCL = MRP: 4 + L = 40 − 0.5L → L = 24, then pays the wage on the supply curve: W = 4 + 0.5 × 24 = $16. B ($22) is the competitive outcome where supply = MRP; C ($28) is the MRP at 24 workers, the gap being the monopsony exploitation.
Q11Labour markets and intervention · Challenge · Paper 4 style · 8 marks
In the market for unskilled factory labour in an invented country, labour demand is Ld = 1000 − 20W and labour supply is Ls = −200 + 40W, where W is the daily wage in $ and L is in thousand workers.
(a)Calculate the equilibrium wage and level of employment.[2]
(b)A minimum wage of $24 per day is introduced. Calculate the change in employment and the excess supply of labour.[3]
(c)Explain why a minimum wage could raise both the wage and employment if the labour market were a monopsony.[3]
Show answer
(a) W = $20 per day; L = 600 thousand
M1 1000 − 20W = −200 + 40W → 60W = 1200. A1 W = $20, L = 600 thousand.
(c) A monopsonist restricts hiring to pay a low wage (MCL above supply). A minimum wage between the monopsony wage and the competitive wage makes MCL horizontal at the minimum wage up to the supply curve, so the firm hires more workers at a higher wage.
1 monopsonist hires where MCL = MRP and pays below MRP; 1 minimum wage removes the need to raise the wage for all workers when hiring one more, so MCL = minimum wage; 1 employment rises towards the competitive level if the minimum is set below the competitive wage.
Q12Labour markets and intervention · Challenge · Paper 4 style · 20 marks
(a)Evaluate whether a national minimum wage is the best way to reduce poverty among low-paid workers.[20]
Show answer
(a) A minimum wage raises pay for those who keep their jobs and can raise employment under monopsony, but it may cause unemployment in competitive markets, does not reach informal workers or the unemployed, and poverty depends on household circumstances. Alternatives (in-work benefits, negative income tax, training, progressive taxes) may target poverty better; a combination is usually best.
Mark bands (20): Level 4 (15–20) accurate, well-explained analysis of both sides, relevant diagram(s) fully used, and a reasoned conclusion that answers the question in context; Level 3 (10–14) mostly accurate analysis, some evaluation but conclusion partly asserted; Level 2 (5–9) limited or partly inaccurate analysis, evaluation mostly descriptive; Level 1 (1–4) a few relevant points. One-sided answers are capped at Level 2. Analysis: competitive labour market diagram with minimum wage above equilibrium → higher wage, lower employment, excess supply; monopsony diagram → higher wage and employment; higher spending of low-paid workers; incentive to work. Evaluation: size of minimum relative to median wage; elasticity of demand for labour; informal sector and enforcement (large in low-income countries); poverty is household-based (number of earners, dependants); alternatives: transfer payments, tax credits, universal basic income, education/training to raise MRP, each with costs (funding, disincentives, time lags). Conclusion: 'best' must be judged against alternatives and context.
Q13Labour markets and intervention · Challenge · Paper 4 style · 20 marks
(a)Evaluate whether differences in labour productivity are the main reason why average wages in the information technology sector are much higher than average wages in agriculture.[20]
Show answer
(a) Productivity (MRP) is a major reason, but supply-side factors (skills, training, barriers, mobility), product demand and prices, market power (unions, monopsony), discrimination, informal employment and government policy also matter.
Mark bands (20): Level 4 (15–20) accurate, well-explained analysis of both sides, relevant diagram(s) fully used, and a reasoned conclusion that answers the question in context; Level 3 (10–14) mostly accurate analysis, some evaluation but conclusion partly asserted; Level 2 (5–9) limited or partly inaccurate analysis, evaluation mostly descriptive; Level 1 (1–4) a few relevant points. One-sided answers are capped at Level 2. Analysis: marginal productivity theory — wage = MRP in competitive markets; MRP = MPP × MR so both productivity and the value of output matter; diagram comparing two labour markets with different demand (MRP) and supply elasticities; supply of IT workers restricted by education and training; large, mobile supply of unskilled farm labour. Evaluation: MRP is hard to measure in services; product prices matter (agricultural prices low and volatile); monopsony landowners or agro-processors; seasonal and informal work; global demand for IT services; discrimination; government minimum support prices. Judgement on 'main reason'.
Q14Policies to correct market failure · Core · Paper 3 style · 1 mark
(a)[1]
Show answer
(a) A $10 per unit; output 20 units
Market output: 20 + 2Q = 110 − 2Q → Q = 22.5. MSC = 30 + 2Q; optimum 30 + 2Q = 110 − 2Q → Q = 20. A tax equal to the marginal external cost ($10) makes MPC + tax = MSC, so output falls to 20. B gives the output before the tax.
Q15Policies to correct market failure · Core · Paper 4 style · 6 marks
(a)Explain what is meant by a 'nudge' in government policy.[2]
(b)Explain how automatic enrolment of employees into a workplace pension scheme is an example of a nudge.[2]
(c)Explain one limitation of using nudges to correct market failure.[2]
Show answer
(a) A change to the way choices are presented that steers people towards a better decision without banning options or changing financial incentives much.
1 influences behaviour through choice architecture/framing; 1 freedom of choice kept (no ban, no large tax).
(b) Workers are placed in the scheme by default and must actively opt out; because of inertia and present bias most stay in, so saving rises while choice is preserved.
1 default option/opt-out; 1 uses inertia or present bias to raise saving.
(c) e.g. effects can be small or fade over time; people may still opt out; they do not raise revenue; seen as manipulative; hard to design for different groups.
1 limitation; 1 explained.
Q16Policies to correct market failure · Core · Paper 4 style · 5 marks
(a)Explain how extending property rights could reduce overfishing in a coastal fishery.[3]
(b)State two problems with using property rights to solve this problem.[2]
Show answer
(a) Open-access fish stocks are a common resource, so each boat overfishes. Giving communities or firms ownership/quotas of the stock makes them bear the cost of depletion, so they limit catches to protect future income.
1 overfishing arises because no one owns the stock (common resource/tragedy of the commons); 1 property rights/individual transferable quotas assign ownership; 1 owners internalise the cost and conserve stocks.
(b) Any two: hard to define and enforce rights at sea; monitoring costs; fish move across boundaries; poor fishers may lose access (equity); transaction costs of bargaining.
1 each.
Q17Policies to correct market failure · Core · Paper 4 style · 5 marks
The weekly market for plastic shopping bags in a city has demand Qd = 900 − 100P and supply Qs = −100 + 100P, where P is the price in Rs per bag and Q is in thousand bags. To reduce litter, the government puts a specific tax of Rs 2 per bag on sellers.
(a)Calculate the new price paid by consumers and the new quantity.[2]
(b)Calculate the government's weekly tax revenue.[1]
(c)Calculate how much of the tax per bag is paid by consumers and how much by producers.[2]
(c) Consumers Rs 1 per bag; producers Rs 1 per bag
1 original equilibrium P = Rs 5 (900 − 100P = −100 + 100P), so consumers pay 6 − 5 = Rs 1; 1 producers receive 6 − 2 = Rs 4, so they bear 5 − 4 = Rs 1.
Q18Policies to correct market failure · Standard · Paper 3 style · 1 mark
(a)Two firms are in a tradable pollution permit scheme. Firm X can cut a tonne of emissions at a cost of $30 and Firm Y at a cost of $70. The permit price is $50 per tonne. What is likely to happen?[1]
Show answer
(a) C X cuts its emissions and sells permits to Y.
X can cut emissions for less than the permit price, so it abates and sells spare permits at $50; Y finds buying a permit at $50 cheaper than abating at $70. Emissions are cut where it is cheapest. A reverses the roles.
Q19Policies to correct market failure · Standard · Paper 4 style · 6 marks
In the market for household solar water heaters in an invented country, MPB = 80 − Q, MSB = 100 − Q and MPC = MSC = 20 + Q, where prices are in $ and Q is in thousand heaters per year.
(a)Calculate the free-market output and the socially optimal output.[2]
(b)The government pays a subsidy of $20 per unit to producers. Calculate the total cost of the subsidy.[2]
(c)Explain one reason why the government may set the subsidy at the wrong level.[2]
Show answer
(a) Free market: 30 thousand; social optimum: 40 thousand
Q20Policies to correct market failure · Standard · Paper 4 style · 8 marks
Invented data. To reduce winter smog and congestion, a city government introduces a daily charge of Rs 500 for cars entering the central business area of Lahore. Car trips into the area fall from 400,000 to 340,000 a day.
(a)Calculate the percentage fall in car trips and the daily revenue from the charge.[2]
(b)Explain how a road-user charge can correct the negative externalities of car use.[3]
(c)Consider one reason why the charge may not achieve the socially optimal number of trips.[3]
(b) Drivers ignore the costs they impose on others (congestion, smog). The charge raises the private cost of driving towards the social cost, so drivers with low benefit switch mode or time, reducing trips towards the social optimum.
1 external costs of congestion and pollution; 1 charge internalises the externality (MPC + charge ≈ MSC); 1 trips fall towards where MSC = MSB.
(c) The external cost is hard to measure, so the charge may be set too low or high; demand for car trips may be inelastic with poor public transport; traffic may divert to roads outside the zone.
1 reason; 1 explanation; 1 judgement/consideration (e.g. effect depends on using revenue to improve buses).
Q21Policies to correct market failure · Standard · Paper 4 style · 7 marks
(a)Explain why a large tax on cigarettes may not reduce smoking by very much.[3]
(b)Consider whether such a tax is still worthwhile for the government.[4]
Show answer
(a) Cigarettes are addictive with few substitutes, so demand is price inelastic: the tax raises price but quantity falls only slightly; smokers may also switch to cheaper illegal or untaxed products.
1 addictive/habit-forming, few substitutes; 1 price inelastic demand → small fall in quantity; 1 smuggling/illegal market or cheaper brands.
(b) Yes in some ways: it raises large revenue (inelastic demand) that can fund healthcare and anti-smoking campaigns, and may deter young people whose demand is more elastic; but it is regressive, may encourage smuggling, and does little to cut external costs if consumption barely falls.
Analysis (up to 3): revenue, long-run elasticity higher, effect on new smokers, internalising external costs. Consideration (1+): regressive, illegal markets, enforcement; judgement.
Q22Policies to correct market failure · Challenge · Paper 3 style · 1 mark
(a)[1]
Show answer
(a) B $24
Free market: 10 + Q = 100 − 2Q → Q = 30. MSC = 22 + Q; optimum: 22 + Q = 100 − 2Q → Q = 26. Welfare loss triangle between MSC and MSB from Q = 26 to 30, with height 12 at Q = 30: ½ × (30 − 26) × 12 = $24. C forgets the ½ (it is a triangle, not a rectangle); D is the total external cost of all 30 units, not the welfare loss.
Q23Policies to correct market failure · Challenge · Paper 4 style · 20 marks
(a)Evaluate whether tradable pollution permits are more effective than direct regulation in reducing carbon emissions from power stations.[20]
Show answer
(a) Permits fix the total quantity of emissions and let firms that can cut cheaply do so, so the target is reached at least cost and firms have an incentive to innovate; regulation is simpler, more certain for each plant and easier to enforce in some countries. Effectiveness depends on the cap, monitoring, permit allocation and market conditions.
Mark bands (20): Level 4 (15–20) accurate, well-explained analysis of both sides, relevant diagram(s) fully used, and a reasoned conclusion that answers the question in context; Level 3 (10–14) mostly accurate analysis, some evaluation but conclusion partly asserted; Level 2 (5–9) limited or partly inaccurate analysis, evaluation mostly descriptive; Level 1 (1–4) a few relevant points. One-sided answers are capped at Level 2. Analysis: negative externality diagram (MSC > MPC); how a cap-and-trade scheme works and why it achieves the cut at lowest total abatement cost; permit price as incentive; regulation (emission limits, technology standards, bans) — certain outcome per plant, but same rule for all ignores different costs. Evaluation: setting the cap and allocating permits (free allocation, lobbying, too many permits → low price); monitoring and enforcement costs; price volatility; carbon leakage; regulation inflexible but suitable where few large plants or where hotspots matter; information failure in both. Conclusion on 'more effective' with conditions.
Q24Policies to correct market failure · Challenge · Paper 4 style · 20 marks
(a)Evaluate the view that providing information and using nudges are better ways to reduce the consumption of sugary drinks than placing a tax on them.[20]
Show answer
(a) Information and nudges tackle the root cause (information failure, present bias) cheaply and preserve choice, but effects are often small; a tax directly raises price, cuts consumption if demand is elastic enough, raises revenue and pushes firms to reformulate, but is regressive and may be weak if demand is inelastic. A combination is often most effective.
Mark bands (20): Level 4 (15–20) accurate, well-explained analysis of both sides, relevant diagram(s) fully used, and a reasoned conclusion that answers the question in context; Level 3 (10–14) mostly accurate analysis, some evaluation but conclusion partly asserted; Level 2 (5–9) limited or partly inaccurate analysis, evaluation mostly descriptive; Level 1 (1–4) a few relevant points. One-sided answers are capped at Level 2. Analysis: demerit good/negative externality and information failure diagram (overconsumption where MPB > MSB); information campaigns and labels shift perceived MPB left; nudges (placement, default portion sizes); tax shifts supply left by the tax, price up, quantity down, revenue raised. Evaluation: PED of sugary drinks; regressive burden on low-income households; substitution to untaxed sugary products; evidence that nudges fade; cost and reach of campaigns; tax revenue can fund health programmes; judgement on 'better'.
Q25Policies to correct market failure · Challenge · Paper 4 style · 20 marks
(a)Evaluate whether privatisation is an effective way to correct market failure in the distribution of electricity in a developing economy.[20]
Show answer
(a) Privatisation may improve efficiency through the profit motive (lower losses and theft, better billing, investment) but electricity distribution is a natural monopoly with externalities and equity issues; without strong regulation, private owners may raise prices and neglect poor areas. Effectiveness depends on regulation and competition.
Mark bands (20): Level 4 (15–20) accurate, well-explained analysis of both sides, relevant diagram(s) fully used, and a reasoned conclusion that answers the question in context; Level 3 (10–14) mostly accurate analysis, some evaluation but conclusion partly asserted; Level 2 (5–9) limited or partly inaccurate analysis, evaluation mostly descriptive; Level 1 (1–4) a few relevant points. One-sided answers are capped at Level 2. Analysis: market failures in electricity (natural monopoly, positive externalities of access, information problems, government failure in state-owned firms: losses, overstaffing); privatisation → profit incentive → productive and dynamic efficiency; access to private capital. Evaluation: private monopoly may restrict output and raise price (monopoly diagram) — needs price-cap regulation; regulatory capture; rural areas unprofitable → subsidies needed; tariffs politically sensitive; evidence varies by country; alternatives such as reform of state firms, competitive tendering. Conclusion on effectiveness and conditions.
Q26Equity and redistribution · Core · Paper 4 style · 5 marks
Invented income tax schedule:First Rs 600,000 of annual income: 0%Rs 600,001 to Rs 1,200,000: 10%Above Rs 1,200,000: 20%
(a)Calculate the income tax paid by a person with an annual taxable income of Rs 2,000,000.[2]
(b)Calculate this person's average rate of tax.[1]
(c) The average rate of tax rises as income rises because higher slices of income are taxed at higher marginal rates (0% → 10% → 20%).
1 average tax rate rises with income; 1 marginal rate above average rate/higher bands.
Q27Equity and redistribution · Standard · Paper 3 style · 1 mark
(a)On a Lorenz curve diagram, the area between the line of perfect equality and the Lorenz curve is 0.18, and the area below the Lorenz curve is 0.32. What is the Gini coefficient?[1]
Show answer
(a) B 0.36
Gini = A ÷ (A + B) = 0.18 ÷ (0.18 + 0.32) = 0.18 ÷ 0.5 = 0.36. C divides 0.18 by 0.32; A forgets to divide by the total area under the equality line.
Q28Equity and redistribution · Standard · Paper 4 style · 8 marks
(a)Explain what is meant by a universal basic income.[2]
(b)Consider whether a universal basic income would reduce inequality more effectively than means-tested benefits.[6]
Show answer
(a) A regular, unconditional cash payment made by the state to every adult, whatever their income or employment status.
1 regular payment to all citizens/adults; 1 not means-tested or conditional on work.
(b) It avoids the poverty trap and stigma, has full take-up and low administration costs, so it reaches all the poor; but paying everyone is very expensive, so the amount may be too low to cut inequality unless financed by progressive taxes; means-tested benefits target money on the poorest.
Analysis (up to 4): means-tested benefits are withdrawn as income rises → high effective marginal tax rates/poverty trap; low take-up, stigma, admin cost; UBI simple and keeps work incentives at the margin; distribution depends on how it is financed. Evaluation (up to 2): fiscal cost, possible inflation, may reduce labour supply (income effect), equal payment to rich and poor; judgement.
Q29Equity and redistribution · Challenge · Paper 4 style · 20 marks
(a)Evaluate whether progressive income taxes are the most effective way to reduce inequality of income and wealth in a developing economy.[20]
Show answer
(a) Progressive taxes narrow post-tax income gaps, but in many developing economies few people pay income tax, the informal sector is large and evasion is common; wealth inequality needs wealth, property or inheritance taxes. Spending on education and health, transfers, minimum wages and land reform may be more effective; a mix is needed.
Mark bands (20): Level 4 (15–20) accurate, well-explained analysis of both sides, relevant diagram(s) fully used, and a reasoned conclusion that answers the question in context; Level 3 (10–14) mostly accurate analysis, some evaluation but conclusion partly asserted; Level 2 (5–9) limited or partly inaccurate analysis, evaluation mostly descriptive; Level 1 (1–4) a few relevant points. One-sided answers are capped at Level 2. Analysis: Lorenz curve/Gini; how progressive taxes raise the average rate with income and fund transfers; effect on disposable income. Evaluation: narrow tax base, informal economy, evasion and avoidance; disincentives to work and invest; capital flight; income taxes do little for wealth inequality (land and property); regressive indirect taxes may dominate the tax system; alternatives — cash transfers (e.g. targeted programmes for poor households), universal education and health, property taxes, minimum wage, microfinance — with their limitations. Conclusion on 'most effective'.
Q30Government failure · Standard · Paper 4 style · 8 marks
(a)Explain what is meant by government failure in microeconomic intervention.[2]
(b)Using the example of a maximum price set below the equilibrium price for wheat flour, consider how such intervention may lead to government failure.[6]
Show answer
(a) When government intervention to correct a market failure leads to a less efficient allocation of resources than before (a net welfare loss).
1 intervention in a market; 1 results in a worse/less efficient outcome than without it.
(b) The price ceiling causes excess demand: shortages, queues, rationing by waiting, black markets, hoarding and smuggling; farmers and millers have less incentive to supply, so output falls. But the policy may protect the poor if combined with subsidies or a buffer stock, so failure depends on design and enforcement.
Analysis (up to 4): diagram with max price below equilibrium; Qd > Qs; shortages, illegal markets at higher prices, lower quality; reduced supply incentive; administrative costs; unintended consequences. Evaluation (up to 2): information problems vs benefits to low-income consumers; can be avoided with release of government stocks, targeted subsidies; judgement on whether the outcome is worse than the free market.
Similar questions
Questions that test the same subtopic in different years, grouped so you can work on one skill at a time.
References only: find each question in its paper (official link where available, otherwise through your school).
Labour markets and interventionBanker28 questions · 9/9 sessions